Whether a type is correctly assigned or not is a subjective judgment. The following are just some
general
criteria tips on how to evaluate the correctness of the predictions.
Note: mind that in several cases, more precise or abstract types do not exist.
If you are not sure
you can check the DBpedia
ontology hierarchy
Yes, totally
If you think the system nailed the prediction (e.g. predicting
Writer for a text describing Shakespeare)
Should be more precise
If you think there is a more concrete type for your description (e.g. the system predicted
Person but you expected something like
Soccer Player)
Should be more abstract
If you think there is a more generic type for your description (e.g. the system predicted
City
but you expected something like Place)
Somehow related
When you think the precition is neither more specific, nor more abstract, but still somehow
related to the type
you were expecting (e.g. the system predicted Valley,
but you were expecting Beach)
No, it is totally wrong
The system did a terrible job predicting, and the prediction is totally out of place (e.g. it
predicted
Musical Work and you expected an Spacecraft)